By Sylvester Samai
The Sierra Leone People’s Party (SLPP), one of Sierra Leone’s oldest political institutions, is currently embroiled in a significant internal conflict. This battle pits the older generation of party stalwarts, who have long dominated the party’s leadership, against a younger, more dynamic faction eager to assert its influence. This generational divide has not only exposed deep-seated tensions within the party but also threatens to undermine its unity and effectiveness as the country navigates critical political, economic, and social challenges. Indications are that this feud could turn nasty in the worst case scenario, could turn bloody. The SLPP is well on record for killing each other in the midst of their internal political feud.
The Sierra Leone People’s Party (SLPP) founded in 1951 has played a pivotal role in Sierra Leone’s post-colonial history. As the party that led the country to independence in 1961, the SLPP has always been associated with the ideals of nationalism, democracy, and social justice. Over the decades, it has been the political home for many of Sierra Leone’s most prominent leaders, including Sir Milton Margai, Albert Margai, and later, Ahmad Tejan Kabbah, who presided over the end of the country’s brutal civil war.
However, like many long-established political organizations, the SLPP has faced its share of internal challenges. The party has seen numerous ideological shifts, leadership struggles, and power dynamics that have shaped its trajectory. The current infighting between the older and younger members of the SLPP is the latest manifestation of these underlying tensions.
Â
The Old Guard: Guardians of Tradition
The older generation within the SLPP, often referred to as the “Old Guard,” represents the traditional power structures within the party. These individuals have been instrumental in shaping the SLPP’s policies and strategies over the years and have a deep sense of loyalty to the party’s historical values and legacy.
Many members of the Old Guard have held significant positions in government, both during and after the civil war. Their approach to governance is often characterized by caution, a preference for stability, and an emphasis on maintaining the party’s established practices and ideologies. They are seen as the custodians of the party’s legacy, and their influence has been pivotal in guiding the SLPP through various political storms.
However, this group has also been criticized for being resistant to change and for holding onto power for too long. Their leadership style is often viewed as top-down, with little room for new ideas or voices. This has led to growing dissatisfaction among younger party members, who feel that the Old Guard’s dominance is stifling the party’s ability to adapt to the changing political landscape of Sierra Leone.
Â
The Young Turks: Agents of Change
In contrast, the younger faction within the SLPP, often labeled as the “Young Turks,” is pushing for a more progressive and modern approach to politics. This group is made up of younger politicians, activists, and technocrats who have grown increasingly frustrated with the perceived inertia of the party’s traditional leadership. They argue that the SLPP needs to evolve to remain relevance in a rapidly changing world and to effectively address the challenges facing Sierra Leone today.
The Young Turks advocate for greater transparency, inclusivity, and innovation within the party. They are pushing for policies that address the needs of a younger, more diverse electorate, and they are critical of what they see as the Old Guard’s failure to tackle issues like corruption, youth unemployment, and economic development with the urgency these problems require.
This younger faction is also more attuned to global trends in governance and politics. They bring with them a more technocratic and policy-oriented approach, often drawing on experiences from abroad and from Sierra Leone’s vibrant civil society. They are less bound by the party’s historical legacy and more focused on the future, which has made them popular with the youth and urban populations but has also put them on a collision course with the party’s traditional leadership.
Key Issues Driving the Infighting
Several critical issues have fueled the infighting between the Old Guard and the Young Turks within the SLPP. These issues are reflective of broader generational and ideological divides, but they also have unique aspects specific to the party’s internal dynamics.
Leadership and Succession: One of the most contentious issues is the question of leadership and succession within the SLPP. The Old Guard is seen as clinging to power, with little interest in grooming the next generation of leaders. This has led to frustration among younger members who feel that their opportunities for advancement are being blocked by an entrenched leadership. The recent push by younger members for greater representation in key party positions has been met with resistance, leading to open confrontations within the party.
Policy Differences: There are also significant policy differences between the two factions. The Old Guard tends to prioritize continuity and stability, often advocating for policies that maintain the status quo. In contrast, the Young Turks are pushing for more radical reforms, particularly in areas such as governance, economic policy, and social issues. These differences have led to a lack of cohesion in the party’s policy platform, with each faction trying to push its agenda at the expense of the other.
Corruption and Accountability: Corruption has long been a problem in Sierra Leone, and it is a major point of contention within the SLPP. The Young Turks have been vocal in their criticism of the Old Guard’s handling of corruption issues, accusing them of being complicit or ineffective in addressing the problem. The Old Guard, on the other hand, sees the Young Turks’ push for anti-corruption measures as overly aggressive and potentially destabilizing. This has created a rift between those who want to take a hard line on corruption and those who prefer a more measured approach.
Youth Engagement: The SLPP’s ability to engage with and mobilize young people has become a critical issue as Sierra Leone’s population becomes increasingly youthful. The Young Turks argue that the party’s traditional methods of engagement are outdated and ineffective in reaching younger voters. They have called for more innovative approaches, including the use of social media and other digital platforms, to connect with the youth. The Old Guard, however, has been slow to embrace these new methods, leading to tensions over how the party should engage with this important demographic.
International Influence and Modernization: The Young Turks have also been influenced by international trends in governance and politics, advocating for modernization and alignment with global best practices. They seek to implement policies that reflect a more globalized and interconnected world. This has sometimes clashed with the Old Guard’s more nationalistic and conservative approach, which is grounded in the party’s historical experiences and traditions.
Key Figures in the Infighting
The internal conflict within the SLPP is not just an abstract struggle; it is also a battle between specific individuals who represent the interests and ideals of their respective factions.
The Old Guard Leadership: The Old Guard includes some of the most senior and experienced politicians in the SLPP, and Sierra Leone by extension. These individuals have been in power for decades and have a deep understanding of the country’s political landscape. Their influence within the party is considerable, and they have been able to maintain their positions through a combination of loyalty, patronage, and control over key party structures.
The Young Turks’ Rising Stars: The Young Turks are represented by a new generation of leaders who have emerged from different sectors, including civil society, academia, and the private sector. These individuals are seen as the future of the party, and they have garnered significant support from younger party members and the broader public. Their rise has been fueled by a combination of frustration with the Old Guard’s leadership and a desire for change.
Key Players in the Middle: There are also key figures within the SLPP who are trying to bridge the gap between the Old Guard and the Young Turks. These individuals recognize the need for generational change but also understand the importance of maintaining party unity. They are advocating for a more gradual transition of power and for the integration of younger members into the party’s leadership structures.
Implications for the SLPP and Sierra Leone
The ongoing infighting within the SLPP has significant implications not only for the party but also for Sierra Leone as a whole. As the ruling party, the SLPP’s internal dynamics have a direct impact on the country’s governance and political stability.
Party Unity: The infighting threatens to split the SLPP, potentially leading to a factionalized party that is less effective in governing. If the party cannot resolve its internal conflicts, it risks losing its cohesion and could see defections to other political parties or the formation of new splinter groups, as it was in 2018. This would weaken the SLPP’s position in future elections and could result in a loss of political power.
Governance Effectiveness: The internal conflict is also affecting the SLPP’s ability to govern effectively. The divisions within the party have led to inconsistent policy implementation and have made it difficult for the government to present a unified front on key issues. This has weakened the party’s ability to address the country’s pressing challenges and has led to a loss of public confidence in its leadership.
Impact on Youth Engagement: The SLPP’s ability to engage with young people is critical to its future success. The infighting has created a perception that the party is out of touch with the concerns of younger voters, which could result in a loss of support among this key demographic. If the Young Turks are unable to gain more influence within the party, there is a risk that young people will turn away from the SLPP and seek alternatives.
Potential for Reform: On the positive side, the infighting could lead to meaningful reforms within the SLPP. The pressure from the Young Turks could force the Old Guard to make concessions and implement changes that modernize the party and make it more responsive to the needs of Sierra Leoneans. If managed well, this conflict could result in a stronger, more dynamic SLPP that is better equipped to continue ruling Sierra Leone.
The infighting within the SLPP is emblematic of the broader generational shift occurring within Sierra Leone’s political landscape. As the Old Guard clings to its historical legacy and influence, the Young Turks are challenging the status quo with a vision for a modern, responsive, and forward-looking party. This struggle, though fraught with tension, holds the potential to either revitalize or fracture the SLPP. If the party can navigate this internal conflict with a commitment to inclusivity and reform, it may emerge stronger and better to address the needs of a changing Sierra Leone. However, if these divisions deepen, the SLPP risks alienating key segments of its base, undermining its ability to lead effectively. Ultimately, the resolution of this internal battle will not only shape the future of the SLPP but will also have lasting implications for the direction of Sierra Leone’s democracy. The path forward requires a delicate balance of respecting tradition while embracing innovation, ensuring that the SLPP remains a vital force in the nation’s political life.